So I'm getting closer to finishing it. I need more diagrams and graphics inside though which will take some time with a graphics program, then it needs editing, review, etc, etc. I'm really looking forward to publishing it because of what it contains. Something near and dear to my heart, tactics. Not strategy, not leadership, not tips and tricks, but good old, plain TACTICS. Over the years I've learned how different militaries execute different maneuvers and 'play the game'. From the Soviets, the Chinese, the VC, the Japanese, the British, the US Army and of course my beloved US Marines.
While I understand USMC tactics quite well I think, it has
been a real challenge with many of the others.
The Army is easy enough because of their manuals and they are similar
enough to the Marines. The others though
are a real challenge; however, in some cases I think their tactics are more
suitable to Airsoft, particularly the Soviet Echelon tactics.
As I look back at many of the games I've played and recalled
those times I've been steamrolled by the enemy several successful tactics tend
to stick out and the ones I think of the most are not the standard Western
style tactics, they are the Soviet Echelon ones that were used, most likely
unintentionally. I dig into the details
in my book but a couple things become apparent.
US Military doctrine is oriented toward defeating Soviet military
doctrine. However, US Military doctrine
takes a couple key points into consideration.
First is the use of machine guns, the use of claymore mines, hand
grenades, Listening Post/Observation Posts and other supporting arms (close air
support, artillery, mortars, naval guns, etc).
In Airsoft none of these things are used except maybe on very rare
occasions, claymore mines. Rarely to
Airsoft teams deploy more than a single SAW and when they do it is just an
additional firepower type of thing, nothing special.
Good, competent, SAW gunners are very difficult to find in
Airsoft and that lends more to the Soviet Doctrine. In the US the SAW/Machine gun is the backbone
of the team. In the Soviet style of
combat it is just additional firepower.
It is interesting to note that most Soviet style weapons are tough,
rugged and the first setting is Automatic, unlike Western weapons where the first
setting is Semi. This was unlikely to
have been done by accident. The USSR and
other Soviet style nations used poorly trained conscripts and their tactics
were designed with that in mind. There
is also a magazine capacity discrepancy between the two.
Nearly every airsoft player is equipped with an automatic
weapon that has a very large magazine.
It frequently seems that most players do not know their weapon actually
has a semi-automatic feature, primarily because they have the magazine capacity
and the weapons are not that accurate, kind of like Soviet weapons.
At any rate, it will be an interesting debate I’m sure when
the book comes out.
For more info check out www.TheAirsoftBible.com
For more info check out www.TheAirsoftBible.com
